User:ElNando888/Blog/Mimic: Difference between revisions

From Eterna Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This entry won't develop much to a blog post. I'm just throwing ideas in the context of a discussion I'm having with [[User:Brourd|Brourd]] about [[mimc]]s.</p>
<p>This entry won't develop much to a blog post. I'm just throwing ideas in the context of a discussion I'm having with [[User:Brourd|Brourd]] about [[mimic]]s.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">

Revision as of 02:50, 18 February 2014

 

This entry won't develop much to a blog post. I'm just throwing ideas in the context of a discussion I'm having with Brourd about mimics.

 

<tbody> </tbody>
1FMN stacking pattern.png Sarcin-ricin stacking pattern.png
FMN Sarcin-ricin (15 nts)

 

The top half is structurally quite similar, but the bottom differs a bit. Specifically, it is undeniable that the FMN molecule offers a much larger stacking area than the A+A platform in motif IL_85647.3

 

<tbody> </tbody>
1FMN stacking pattern.png Sarcin-ricin (reduced) stacking pattern.png
FMN Sarcin-ricin (13 nts)

 

A possible way to compensate the difference would be to use a reduced form of the loop, with an additional cWW pair, like in motif IL_49493.4

----

 

By the way, this canonical pairs mimic...

<tbody> </tbody>
Mimic 1.png Mimic 2.png

I'm counting -11.9 kcal, much more than the -4.9 that we're supposed to mimic...