Talk:Reproducibility Test Lab: Difference between revisions
From Eterna Wiki
Latest comment: 31 August 2013 by Omei
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<p>-- [[User:ElNando888|ElNando888]] ([[User talk:ElNando888|talk]]) 13:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)</p> | <p>-- [[User:ElNando888|ElNando888]] ([[User talk:ElNando888|talk]]) 13:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)</p> | ||
<p>----</p> | <p>----</p> | ||
<p> | <p>Done.</p> | ||
<p>[[User:Omei|Omei]] ([[User talk:Omei|talk]]) | <p>[[User:Omei|Omei]] ([[User talk:Omei|talk]]) 23:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)</p> |
Revision as of 23:02, 31 August 2013
== Sequences ==
I formatted them differently, which made me notice that the 2 currently in the list are a little "off". 80 bases doesn't seem to match well with anything. Typically, there are:
- 5 bases for the starting tail
- 63 bases for the design (which is now variable, up to 89 I believe)
- 19 bases for the barcode
- 20 bases for the ending tail
What segment(s) should we use?
-- ElNando888 (talk) 13:25, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
----
My mistake in entering the sequences. It should just be the 63 base part. (Which is no longer constrained to be 63.)
Omei (talk) 16:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
== Candidate ==
May I offer to include http://eterna.cmu.edu/game/browse/2712696/?filter1_arg1=2736789&filter1=Id&filter1_arg2=2736789 ?
This sequence is quite special, and I think it would be very interesting to see if this is indeed reproducible.
-- ElNando888 (talk) 13:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
----
Done.